Program Description

""enVision puts math students at the center of learning, encouraging active exploration and discovery to help them see how math connects to their world. •A complete core curriculum built around the content and skills key to supporting every math learner, at every grade •Empowers students to think, solve, and succeed by taking the lead in their learning as they build confidence through real-world problem solving •Learning that feels useful and relevant, grounded in real-life experiences •Personalized learning pathways for each student’s learning needs •Regular opportunities for informed instruction drive continuous improvement""

Cost

Request sample and contact publisher for pricing

Intended Population

• Core
• Intervention

Grade

• Elementary School
• Middle School

Intended Group Size

• Small group
• Classroom

ELL/DLL

• Unspecified

Multisensory Applications

• Yes

Delivery Method

• Hybrid / blended delivery

Scripted

• Instructor Scripted

Comprehensive or Skill Specific

• Comprehensive

Placement Tests

• Yes

Accelerated Learning

• Unspecified

Assessment to Monitor Skills Mastery

• Yes

Error Correction Built In

• Unspecified

Fidelity Measures Provided by Publisher

• Yes

Research Summary

One non-peer reviewed study comparing four different curricula found that 1st and 2nd graders receiving the enVisionMath curriculum outperformed those receiving the Investigations curriculum., but experienced similar gains to those receiving the Math Expressions and Saxon curricula. No peer-reviewed research was found. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of enVisionMath at this time.

Study Citations

Agodini, R., Harris, B., Seftor, N., Remillard, J., & Thomas, M. (2013). After two years, three elementary math curricula outperform a fourth (NCEE 2013-4019). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544185.pdf

What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Report

• No studies met WWC inclusion criteria

Evidence Base (ESSA)

• Qualifying studies found no significant positive outcomes

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

• Insufficient evidence

Additional Reviews

• https://edreports.org/reports/overview/envision-mathematics-common-core-2024