SuccessMaker
Overview
Focus
Specific Skills
- General Math Ability
Program Length
15-20 minutes, 2-3 days a week
Program Description
"Welcome to the most powerful SuccessMaker ever for Grades K-8 reading and math. It does it all to make EVERY student more successful. This is “true” adaptive learning for intervention, differentiation, and personalization. Every student interaction adjusts instruction in real time to real learning needs. SuccessMaker® delivers tutorials, practice, challenge, and remediation. It instantly adjusts pacing and sequencing. It continuously assesses in a natural, unobtrusive way."
Visit Program WebsiteCost
Must contact publisher for pricing.
More Pricing DetailsDemographics & Delivery
Intended Population
- Intervention
- Intensified intervention
Grade
- Elementary School
- Middle School
Intended Group Size
- Any
ELL/DLL
- Partial
Multisensory Applications
- Yes
Computer-Based Delivery
- Full
Scripted
- Instructor Scripted
Program Specifics
Comprehensive or Skill Specific
- Skill Specific
Placement Tests
- Yes
Accelerated Learning
- Yes
Assessment to Monitor Skills Mastery
- Yes
Error Correction Built In
- Unspecified
Fidelity Measures Provided by Publisher
- Unspecified
Research & Evaluation
Research Summary
Only one peer-reviewed article examining academic outcomes of students using SuccessMaker math was found by the NeMTSS team. The article lacked clarity in several domains (including measures used and experiment setting). Authors reported increased GPA scores for students in group receiving teacher-facilitated computer intervention (SuccessMaker); howver, no student scores improved to passing levels.
Study Citations
Gatti, G. (2011). Pearson SuccessMaker reading efficacy study 2010–11 final report. Pittsburgh, PA: Gatti Evaluation, Inc.
Powell, J. V., Aeby Jr., V. G., Carpenter-Aeby, T. C. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes with and without teacher facilitated computer-based instruction. Computers and Education, 40, 183-191.
Underwood, J. D. M. (2000). A comparison of two types of computer support for reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 136-148.
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Report
- No studies met WWC inclusion criteria
Evidence Base (ESSA)
- Qualifying studies found no significant positive outcomes
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
- Insufficient evidence